°£¸¸¿¡ ¶óÀÌÄ« 100-400 ¸®ºä°¡ ¿Ã¶ó¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù.
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2016/05/02/the-mighty-panasonic-leica...
Apple | iPhone 5s | 2016-04-02 15:12:41
Program Normal | Multi-Segment | Auto WB | 1/470s | F2.2 | 0.00 EV | ISO-32 | 4.15mm | 35mm equiv 41mm | Flash not fired; Compulsory flash mode
samsung | SAMSUNG-SM-G925A | 2016-04-02 15:16:55
Program Normal | Centre Weighted Average | Auto WB | 1/620s | F1.9 | 0.00 EV | ISO-40 | 4.30mm | 35mm equiv 28mm | Not Fired
CONCLUSION
I like this lens a great deal. I have never had this kind of reach before, and for some of the subjects I like to shoot I feel it will be invaluable. I¡¯m very impressed that the IQ compares ¡°quite well¡± to the Olympus 40-150mm. If I was going on a trip where I wanted this extra reach, I¡¯d have no problem leaving that Oly lens at home, maybe throwing in a couple of Olympus primes for the intermediate range.
All things considered, this is an effective 800mm lens that is 6.5¡± long (collapsed) – a modern marvel, in my book anyway.
Would really have been nice to compare my images with my friend¡¯s, with his Canon bazooka. Especially since his older body is also a 16mp like the OMD M5 II. But I¡¯m not trying to get into NatGeo with my images. I especially appreciate the size/weight/value proposition of this Panasonic lens. His outings with that lens are few and far between, whereas I can bring this lens along anytime I want.
Although I didn¡¯t show these images, for a while it appeared to me that images at 300mm were superior to those at 400mm. I did some test shots and cropped the 300mm ones to see an equivalent. Upon review, my thoughts just didn¡¯t seem to hold up. I didn¡¯t see any significant degradation at 400mm vs 300mm.
¡Ú ¿öÇÁ¯¢â´ÔÀÇ ÆËÄÚ ¾Ù¹ü ¡Ú
https://photo.popco.net/o2warp