ÆÄ³ª¼Ò´Ð Photo&TalK
 
[Á¤º¸] 7-14mm/F2.8(Olympus) vs 7-14/F4(Lumix) ¸ñ·Ï
±Û¾´ÀÌ : ¿öÇÁ¯¢â µî·ÏÀÏ : 2015-06-01 13:03:41 Á¶È¸¼ö : 2,951 Ãßõ¼ö : 0
mirrorlessons.com¿¡ ¿Ã¸²Çª½º 7-14/F2.8ÀÇ ¸®ºä°¡ ¿Ã¶ó¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù.

±× ¸®ºä Áß°£¿¡ Lumix 7-14/F4¿ÍÀÇ ºñ±³µµ ÀÖ¾î

ÆÛ ¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù.

¸µÅ© : http://www.mirrorlessons.com/2015/05/28/olympus-7-14-2-8-pro-review/


What is also interesting is that the composition slightly changes between one lens and the other even when set to the same focal length. I used a tripod to take all my images and I can assure you that I didn¡¯t move it between shots.

The Lumix 7-14mm proves an excellent competitor despite being a much older lens.

There isn¡¯t a drastic difference concerning sharpness. The differences in perspective distortion are a question of taste. I would say that the Olympus lens can be a better choice for precise architectural compositions while I could recommend the Lumix version for landscapes. The M.Zuiko version has the obvious advantage of having a faster aperture, which can make all the difference on a m4/3s camera, especially when shooting indoors. It is also more versatile thanks to its closer focusing and bokeh capabilities and has a better resistance to flare.

It really comes down to the individual photographer¡¯s needs. One thing to consider is that the retail price isn¡¯t that different. However, since the Lumix 7-14mm is older, you can probably find it at a better price or second-hand.

»ùÇÃÀ̹ÌÁö´Â ¿ø¹®¿¡¼­ º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ°í... ÇØ¼®Àº ¿µ¾î ÀßÇϽô ºÐ²² Å佺ÇÕ´Ï´Ù....


¡Ú ¿öÇÁ¯¢â´ÔÀÇ ÆËÄÚ ¾Ù¹ü ¡Ú
https://photo.popco.net/o2warp
Ãßõ 0
ÆËÄÚ³ÝÀº ȸ¿ø¿©·¯ºÐµéÀÌ °¡²Ù¾î °¡´Â °ø°£ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó´ë¿¡°Ô »óó¸¦ Áֱ⺸´Ù´Â °°ÀÌ Áñ°Å¿ö ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸ÚÁø ÄÚ¸àÆ® ºÎʵå·Á¿ä.
»ó´ë¹æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ¹æÀ̳ª ¿å¼³µî ºÎÀûÀýÇÑ ÄÚ¸àÆ®ÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿î¿µÁøÀÇ ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ¿¡ »èÁ¦µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸´Ï ÁÖÀÇ ºÎʵ右´Ï´Ù.

¼Ò¼È ·Î±×ÀÎ ³²°ÜÁֽŠÀǰßÀº ÆËÄÚ³Ýȸ¿ø ºÐµé¿¡°Ô Å« º¸Åưú ÈûÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù. »õ·Î°íħ

·Î±×ÀÎÈÄ ´ñ±ÛÀ» ÀÛ¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌÀ¯: ±ÇÇÑÀÌ ¾ø´Â ȸ¿ø·¹º§
½Å°í
  
Copyright 1999-2025 Zeroboard
¸ÇÀ§·Î